To prepare the Swagger file, JSON and YAML formats are supported. YAML is recommended because it is easier to edit. Since the YAML file is in plain text, you must use Common Mark (commonmark.org/) if you want to insert styles, links, etc. into the document. The principle applies to the RESTful API, a popular interface format between systems in modern software design. One of the most important aspects of the DIA is to determine who is responsible for carrying out the activities, approving the results of the work, supporting the development or execution of the activities, informing the other party of the necessary information and, if necessary, requesting consultation on the activity or work product (the well-known CISIP). The DIA should also go into detail about the expected work product and how it should be completed (if a certain format is required, an assessment will be conducted by the client or a third party, etc.). It can be signed by both parties when an agreement is reached, but not always. The customer should ensure that the DIA is reviewed based on the specific results required by each vendor. The customer must indicate what is expected of the supplier and what documentation and information is provided to the supplier in order to effectively meet these requirements. This should then be checked very carefully by the supplier to ensure that all these requirements are understood, and the supplier should clearly state assumptions and seek clarification on anything that is not fully understood.
In a modern way, the API interface document is a living document that consists of the following function: The API interface is a contract between 2 or more systems, usually different teams or companies, to agree on the interactions and behavior of the system. Traditionally, the interface contract is in Word document format, which specifies the use cases, interface, format, example, error code, etc. It can be more than 50 pages of document. An interface agreement is a document that defines an interface between two teams/sites/functional responsibilities. The interface on each system that establishes the connection between the systems is called the “interface”. A contract should be concluded for the format of the data, the handling of errors and the use of the connection. After you finish editing the Swagger file, you can generate the document in HTML format using the JS Spectale or ReDoc Interface Agreement package node, which is similar to the interface document. Some contractors may refer to an interface issue that has been agreed (and possibly signed) as an interface agreement. A jointly understood and agreed development interface agreement provides the customer and supplier with the information necessary to properly plan and execute the activities and work products that lead to a functionally safe end product.
As simple as it may seem, there seems to be a big difference in how these agreements are presented and executed, which could potentially lead to problems or concerns later in the project. An interface plan is an agreement between the parties to the interface on the intended access to “contract items” prior to unloading and delivery – for example, to test underwater ECUs, umbilical cord, etc. Note that the project interface management plan is a basic project document that defines how interfaces are managed and is described in more detail here. The Development Interface Agreement (DIA) is the most important document to ensure the successful planning and completion of a program`s functional safety objectives. It is supposed to be a tool and a record of what is expected of each party, and should specify the exact means for completion. For example, it can contain (or refer to) battery limit drawings, an interface matrix, or interface registers. Tags: DIA, Functional Safety Requirements, Latent Defect Metric, Safety Plan Here are some of the issues and concerns I`ve noticed in AID in the industry: I really like reading on this website, it contains some great blog posts. Again, the client must be as specific as possible in defining the project expectations, and the supplier must take care to review the DIA and not accept the DIA until it is fully understood. It is very useful to use the DIA as the basis for developing the security plan, followed by regular reviews throughout the program to ensure that each party`s obligations are met. This will help ensure open communication between the two parties and support the goal of success of a functionally safe product. This is probably the most missed part of the DIA. Without identifying set points at the beginning of the program, design requirements and hardware components may be incorrectly identified.
This can very well lead to concerns in the success of a functionally reliable product. It is the customer`s responsibility to communicate the relevant target values for the respective system or component based on system-level objectives so that the supplier achieves the target values for point and latent error measurements. Failure to communicate this correctly may result in assumptions on the part of the supplier that may not meet the system-level requirements identified for the project. This could most likely lead to a redesign that will result in significant cost and time issues, and depending on when the discrepancy is discovered, this could lead to concerns about compliance with general functional safety requirements. Very useful for me to understand the relevant documents of iso26262 used more by stakeholders who “own” part of a project than between contractors (which relate to their contract) – but see the green note below. This closely follows the last point. Although the client considers “grey areas” to be a cause for concern, they could most likely lead to a delay in the project or a less successful completion of the project. For the supplier, these “grey areas” are likely to lead to assumptions that may be wrong, cause unnecessary work or incorrect delivery. While it may not be possible to complete an AAD prior to procurement, it should be completed as soon as possible at the outset of the program. If this is delayed, there may be different expectations that are accepted by each party, and the project may not be properly supported to ensure success. This could lead to time constraints, resource issues, and possibly design issues.